Nuckle

Nuckle is our oldest typeface, originally designed in 2011 before Heavyweight was officially formed. It is a functional grotesque built around an increased x-height, which gives it exceptional legibility at small sizes while maintaining presence at display scale. The difference between uppercase and lowercase is deliberately minimal, placing emphasis on clean, readable accents.

  • Design: Filip Matejíček, Jan Charvát
  • Production: Heavyweight
  • Spacing/Kerning: Renegade Fonts
  • Number of glyphs: 1095
  • Number of styles: 16
  • Number of languages: 301
  • Date of release: 2026
  • Version: 2.031
Everyone
pretended this
sort of thing
happens all the
»time«

A small studio
works patiently
on floor 4.

187 Gower Street
NW1:6XE

Regular

The building at 1411 West Madison Street had been a cold storage facility for a wholesale meat distributor until 1971, when the company relocated to a larger property in Cicero and the lease was quietly allowed to expire. The structure stood empty for nearly four years. Its loading dock faced an alley. Its windows, set high on the north and east walls, had been painted over with a grey industrial coating that admitted no natural light. The floor was poured concrete, reinforced for the weight of refrigeration equipment that had long since been removed. The ceiling, supported by cast iron columns at twelve-foot intervals, was eighteen feet above the floor at its highest point. In the winter of 1975, a man named Raymond Lyle acquired the lease for $340 a month and spent the following eighteen months converting the space into something that had no precise name at the time.

Regular

Side Ⓐ
Open Door Policy 7:42
Late Arrival 5:18
First Body 8:03
Warm Room 6:55
Low Ceiling 9:21
Concrete Floor 7:44

Side Ⓑ
Slow Build 8:37
No Windows 6:14
Interior Light 7:58
Second Movement 9:45
Repeat Sequence 6:22

Side Ⓒ
Deep Frequency 8:51
Parallel Room 7:03
Four to the Floor 10:44
Continuous Feed 8:29

Side Ⓓ
Minimum Pressure 6:48
Return Signal 9:02
Extended Version 14:27
Raw Material 8:11

Side Ⓕ
Low End Theory 7:39
Closed Circuit 8:44
Inner Room 6:57
Late Sequence 9:18

Side Ⓖ
No Resolution 8:33
Gradual Return 7:21
Morning Frequency 10:47

Side (F)
First Light 8:02
Open Window 6:44
Slow Exit 9:38
Last Body 7:55
Departure Signal 8:13

Side Ⓗ
After Hours Protocol 11:42
Residual Heat 7:08
Closing Sequence 9:55
Empty Room 8:37

Side Ⓘ
Morning Report 7:23
Final Movement 10:18
No Re-Entry 6:52
Concrete Morning 9:44

Side Ⓙ
Everything Ends at Six 6:00

Regular

West Side
South Loop
Bronzeville
Pilsen
Hyde Park
Wicker Park
Bridgeport
Pullman
Calumet
Blue Island
River North
Humboldt
Logan Square
Andersonville
Bucktown
Englewood
Woodlawn
Chatham

Regular

The Loft (C) Chicago
1411 W. Madison St.
Every Sat. Since 1977
Members Only
Doors Close at 06:00

Regular

The records arrived in no particular order and by no particular system. Some came through distributors, small operations on the South Side that received shipments from pressing plants in (US) and, less regularly, from importers who dealt in product from (GB) and (DE). Others came directly from the people who made them: DJs and producers who pressed their own material in runs of 200 or 300 copies and brought them in person, sometimes on a Saturday afternoon, sometimes in the middle of a night when the room was full and the timing was either very good or very bad depending on how you looked at it. Raymond looked at it as good. He said that a record that arrived during a night had already been tested. If someone had carried it across the city at that hour, it meant something. The log was kept in a green ledger purchased from an office supply store on West Lake Street. The first entry is dated April 23rd, 1977, nine days after the first Saturday night. It reads: Deep Signal, no label, 12 inch, 45 rpm, unknown pressing date, unknown origin, filed Crate 1. The handwriting is small and consistent throughout. Raymond wrote in block capitals for titles and in lower case for notes. The notes were brief: works early, or not for the floor, or plays slow, check pitch. Occasionally: do not play until after 2. Occasionally, and only for a small number of records across the six years of the log: irreplaceable. By the end of 1978 the log contained 847 entries. By 1980 it was over 1,400. By the time the last entry was made, in March of 1983, the total was 2,291 records, each assigned a crate number, a playing speed, an approximate genre description in Raymond's own terminology (deep, driving, transitional, closing, morning), and a brief note. The genre descriptions did not correspond to any external classification system. They were functional rather than taxonomic. A record described as morning was not necessarily recorded in the morning or intended to evoke the morning. It was a record that worked in the last hour of a night when the room was changing and the people who remained were a different group from the people who had arrived. The log was among the materials recovered from the storage space on South Halsted Street in 2009. It is in good condition. The cover is water-stained but the pages are intact and legible throughout. The private collector who acquired it in 2011 had it photographed in full but has not made the photographs available for publication. A partial transcription, covering entries from April 1977 to December 1978, was circulated informally in 2014 among a small group of researchers interested in the period. Its current whereabouts are unknown.

Italic

The following specifications apply to all sessions at the above address. Departures from these specifications require prior approval from R. Lyle and will not be accommodated on the night. Turntables: Two (2) Technics SL-1200 Mk2. Pitch control set to zero at start of session. Adjustments permitted during session at operator discretion. Cartridges: Shure M44-7, installed. Do not replace without prior authorization. Stylus condition checked before each session. If stylus shows wear, replacement available from the locked cabinet behind the booth. Key held by R. Lyle only. Mixer: Urei 1620 (modified). Gain structure set before each session by C. Webb or designated technician. Do not adjust input gain settings. Channel faders and crossfader may be used freely. EQ: use with restraint. The room has been tuned. Adjustments to the EQ affect the room, not only the monitor. If in doubt, do not adjust. Monitor level: set at start of session. Do not reduce. The monitor is aimed at the floor. This is intentional. Trust what you hear. Records: visiting DJs may use their own records. The house collection (Crates 1 through 14, west wall) may be used with permission. Crate 15 (closing records) may not be used by visiting DJs under any circumstances. If you want to close the night, speak to R. Lyle before midnight. Lighting: controlled from the panel on the east wall. Not accessible from the booth. If you have a request regarding lighting, speak to R. Lyle. The answer will usually be no. Timing: sessions begin at 22:00. The floor is typically slow until midnight. Do not chase the room in the first hour. The room will come to the music. It always does. Finish: sessions conclude at 06:00. This is not a suggestion. At 05:45 R. Lyle will signal from the floor. One record after the signal, then close. No exceptions. No extensions. The morning has its own requirements. Payment: agreed in advance. Cash only. Collected at end of session from R. Lyle personally. Questions: ask before Saturday. Not during.

Regular

First Saturday, April 1977. Approximately 80 people. Arrived around midnight, left just before five. The sound in that room is unlike anything I have heard in Chicago or New York. The low end is physical in a way that is not aggressive. It does not push. It holds. Standing in the center of the floor you feel the room as a whole thing, the floor and the air and the people together. I do not know how this has been achieved. I do not think it would help to know. Second Saturday, April 1977. The crowd was different. More people from the South Side. Someone said Raymond had been passing word through Bronzeville. The music was slower in the first hour than last week. He let the room find itself before he moved it. By two o'clock the temperature in the room had risen noticeably. Not unpleasant. Necessary. Third Saturday, May 1977. First night I brought records. Raymond looked at them for a long time before he said anything. He put three of them in Crate 1 and handed the rest back without explanation. I did not ask for one. The three he kept were not the ones I would have predicted. May, later. Cannot remember the exact date. The room was very full. Someone had brought people from out of town, (NY) I think, or possibly (DE), I heard both. The music ran continuously from about 11pm until nearly six without what I would describe as a break, though it shifted constantly. I have been trying to find a word for what happens in that room when it is working correctly and I cannot find one that is precise enough. Continuous is the closest. Not repetitive. Continuous. There is a difference. June 1977. First time I heard a record I did not recognize. Asked Raymond afterward. He said it was from a pressing plant on the West Side, 200 copies, no distribution. He had the only copy in the room. He played it twice in the same night, separated by about forty minutes. Both times the floor responded as if it were new. September 1977. Raymond let someone else mix for the first time. A man named L., from the South Side, whose last name I never learned. He played for two hours in the middle of the night, from about one to three. Raymond stood at the back of the room and watched the floor. Not the DJ. The floor. October 1977. The first tape recording. Curtis Webb set up a single microphone on a stand at the south end of the room, pointed at the ceiling. Raymond said the ceiling was where the sound went to become itself. I thought this was obscure at the time. I think I understand it now.

Italic

To R. Lyle, West Madison St., Chicago.
Dated February 14th, 1978.
Raymond, I have been thinking about what you said last month regarding the question of whether what happens in that room on Saturday nights is a private thing or a public thing. I think it is neither, or both, depending on the night. The people who come know where they are going and they choose to go there. In that sense it is private. But what happens when they arrive is not private in any meaningful sense. It is shared. That is the whole point of it. A private experience of music is listening at home alone. What you have built is something else. I do not have a word for it either. Regarding the (DE) records you asked about: I have been in contact with the importer on South Michigan and he says the next shipment is expected in March. I will let you know when it arrives. The pressing quality on the last batch was inconsistent but the two records you selected from it have been among the best things I have heard this year. To R. Lyle, West Madison St., Chicago. Dated October 3rd, 1979. I wanted to write after last Saturday to say that the session by L. was the best I have heard in that room since the spring. I know you have reservations about the tempo he works at in the early hours but I think the reservation may be about something other than the tempo. The floor was with him. The floor is usually the correct measure of these things. I also wanted to say that the record he played at approximately 3:15am, the one with no label, pressed on clear vinyl, is something I would very much like to know more about. If you are not able to share the information I understand. But if you are, I am asking. There are rooms and there are rooms. Most rooms are built for a purpose and serve that purpose adequately and are then used for something else or demolished. Occasionally a room becomes something more than its purpose. This has happened on West Madison Street. I am writing this down because I have been thinking about what it will mean when it ends, and I am certain it will end, everything ends, and I want there to be a record of what it was. It was a room where the music was taken seriously. That is not a small thing. Most rooms where music is played, the music is incidental. Here it was the reason for everything: the sound system, the selection, the timing, the light, the temperature, the hour at which the doors closed. Everything was in service of the music and the people in the room with the music. I am not able to describe this more precisely. I am not sure precision is the right tool for it. What I can say is that on the best nights, which were more frequent than you might expect, the room became a single thing. Not a collection of people listening to music. A single thing. This is what Raymond built. I do not know if he knew that was what he was building when he started. I think he knew by the end of the first year. The last entry in the log, March 1983, is brief. It reads: Final session. Everything as it should be. R.L.

Medium

Sound
ILLINOIS

Light


Light


Medium

1
SPEED
22:00

Medium

½
SPEED
23:14

Medium

Deep Signal → No Label
Clear Vinyl, 300 Copies Only
Test Pressing, Series 🅑
Do Not Duplicate! Filed 1979

Medium

The first thing Raymond Lyle did every Saturday was check the pitch on the turntables. Not because they drifted, they did not drift, the Technics SL-1200 Mk2 did not drift under normal conditions, but because the act of checking was the beginning of the night, the first step in a sequence that ended eight hours later when he lifted the needle from the last record and turned off the monitors. Curtis Webb had asked him once why he bothered, given that the pitch control was set to zero and locked with a small piece of tape that Raymond replaced every few weeks when it began to lose its adhesion. Raymond said that checking the pitch was not about the pitch. It was about attention. The night required a particular quality of attention from its first moment to its last, and checking the pitch was how he established that quality in himself before anyone else arrived. Webb said he understood. He was not sure he did, but he said it anyway, because Raymond had a way of explaining things that made further questions feel unnecessary. The room on West Madison Street had been a cold storage facility! Its floor was poured concrete, its ceiling was eighteen feet at the highest point, its windows had been painted over with industrial grey coating that admitted no natural light at any hour. Raymond had chosen it for these properties, not despite them. He had looked at twelve other spaces in Chicago (IL) and two in (IN) before he found this one, and what he said when he first walked in was not an exclamation of enthusiasm but a single quiet observation: the room already knows what it wants to be. Webb, who had accompanied him on the inspection, remembered this clearly when interviewed in 2014 (Chicago Sound Archive, Ref. No. CSA-2014-007). He said: I thought at the time that this was either very perceptive or completely wrong, and I was not sure which. By 1979 I was sure. The sound system Raymond installed in the spring of 1977 was assembled from components sourced across four suppliers, two in (IL), one in (NY), and one through an importer who dealt primarily in professional audio equipment from (DE) & (JP). The subwoofers were mounted in concrete housings. The crossover was set at 120 Hz. The monitors in the booth faced the floor rather than the operator. These were not standard decisions. Every one of them was correct. The question Webb asked himself most often in the months following the installation was not whether the system worked (it worked!) but why it worked in the particular way that it did, which was not merely loud or clear or powerful but specifically calibrated to the dimensions and materials of that room. The answer was that Raymond had spent more time listening to the room empty than Webb had spent listening to rooms his entire professional life. He had stood in the center of the concrete floor at different times of day and made sounds (he clapped, he spoke, he dropped things) and listened to what the room did with those sounds. He had done this for six weeks before Webb arrived to begin the installation. By the time the first component was mounted, Raymond already knew where the low frequencies would accumulate (the northeast corner), where the ceiling would create reflection problems (directly above the booth), and where the floor would transmit vibration most efficiently (a strip approximately four feet wide running from the booth to the north wall).

Medium

The installation followed from this knowledge rather than preceding it. Was this unusual? Yes! Was it documented anywhere in the professional literature on sound system design at the time? No. Would it have been believed if described to a professional audio engineer unfamiliar with the room? Almost certainly not. Did it work? Without question. The records in Crate (1) through Crate (14) were organized by Raymond according to a system that existed entirely in his own understanding. It was not alphabetical. It was not chronological. It was not organized by label, pressing plant, country of origin (though he knew these things for every record he owned, including the 34 pressings from (GB), the 19 from (DE), the 7 from (NL), and the 2 from (JP) that arrived in early 1981 through the same importer who had supplied the audio components). The organization was functional! A record belonged in Crate (3) if it worked in the second hour of a Saturday night, meaning after midnight but before the room had reached its full temperature. A record belonged in Crate (7) if it was what Raymond called a bridge record, meaning a record that could move the room from one state to another without the movement being perceptible as a transition. Crate (15), the closing crate, contained 23 records by the time the log reached its final entry in March 1983. Of these, 11 had no label. 6 were test pressings. 4 had been given to Raymond directly by the people who made them, without commercial release of any kind. 2 were acetates, fragile and irreplaceable, which Raymond handled with a care that Webb described as approaching reverence. The word is not too strong. The first Saturday of every month Raymond played a record from Crate (15) before midnight, which was unusual because closing records were by definition not for the early part of a night. When Webb asked about this Raymond said: you have to know where you are going. Playing the destination early does not make the journey shorter. It makes the destination more certain. Webb wrote this down in a notebook he kept during the period of the installation and the early years of the Saturday sessions. The notebook is in his possession. He has not published its contents. He has read from it once, at a private gathering in Chicago (IL) in 2016, to an audience of eleven people, none of whom he will identify by name. The gathering was not recorded. When asked subsequently about what he read, Webb said only: it was accurate. The sessions continued every Saturday from April 1977 until March 1983, with four exceptions: the Saturday of a significant snowstorm in January 1979 (the city was effectively closed & Raymond judged the roads impassable), two Saturdays in the summer of 1980 when a fault in the electrical supply to the building made the sound system inoperable, and one Saturday in November 1981 whose circumstances Raymond never explained and which does not appear in the log. The total number of sessions was therefore 307. The total number of records played across those 307 sessions has never been calculated, because the log records titles and crate numbers but not always the sequence or frequency of play for individual records. The total number of people who attended at least one session is unknown. Raymond kept no guest list. Gerald Oates, who stood at the loading dock entrance from the first night to the last, kept no record either. He operated entirely from memory & from judgment, and the judgment was, by all accounts, sound. Was there ever an incident at the door? Once! In the summer of 1978, a group of people arrived who Oates did not admit. They were not regulars. They had not been invited by anyone Oates knew. They left without incident. Raymond was told about it the following week. He said: Gerald was right. He did not elaborate. He did not need to. The tapes recorded by Curtis Webb beginning in October 1977 represent the only continuous audio documentation of the sessions. There are 47 tapes in total. The longest is seven hours and twelve minutes (Saturday 6 January 1979, full night, recorded on a single Ampex 456 reel at 15 ips). The shortest is one hour and forty minutes (date unknown, labeled only Late Session, possibly 1982). The recording quality varies significantly across the collection, partly because the microphone position was adjusted several times over the years and partly because the acoustic conditions in the room changed as the number of people present changed. A room with 80 people sounds different from a room with 300. Both sounds are on the tapes. The tapes have not been digitized. They are stored in a climate controlled unit in Evanston (IL). The monthly cost of the storage unit is $47. Webb has paid this without interruption since 1984. He has been asked on three occasions whether he would consider making the tapes available for archival purposes. He has said no each time! His stated reason is that the tapes were made to document the room for his own understanding, not for public circulation. His unstated reason, which he has implied but never articulated directly, is that the experience of being in that room on a Saturday night was not a thing that transferred to another medium. The tapes are accurate. They are not the same. He knows the difference because he was there, and he can hear the difference when he listens, and the difference is the thing he is unwilling to offer as a substitute for the thing itself. The thing itself ended in March 1983. The system was dismantled in the autumn of that year. The building on West Madison Street was subsequently used for storage, then vacant, then demolished in 1991. The concrete floor, which had been poured specifically for refrigeration equipment and was substantially thicker than standard commercial construction, was broken up with pneumatic equipment over two days. Webb drove past the site on the second day. He did not stop. He noted the thickness of the concrete as the equipment broke through it & thought about the subwoofer housings that had been mounted in similar material on the south wall. Then he drove on. He has not returned to the block since. The log, the tapes, the manila envelope, the milk crates, the unfinished letter: all of these are accurate records of something that no longer exists in the form in which it existed. This is the condition of all records. It is not a failure of the record. It is the nature of what records are for. There is a particular kind of knowledge that belongs to people who have spent a significant portion of their lives in record shops. It is not encyclopedic in the way that academic knowledge is encyclopedic. It does not proceed from general principles to specific cases. It proceeds in the opposite direction, from the specific object in the hand, the particular pressing, the weight of the vinyl, the color of the label, the condition of the sleeve, outward toward a general understanding that is never fully articulable because it is built from ten thousand individual encounters with ten thousand individual records rather than from any organizing theory. Raymond Lyle had this knowledge to a degree that Curtis Webb, who was not a record person in the same way, found genuinely difficult to comprehend. Webb understood sound systems. He understood acoustics & signal flow & the physics of low-frequency reproduction in enclosed spaces. What he did not understand, and said so freely when asked, was how Raymond could pick up a record he had never seen before, look at it for thirty seconds, and say with confidence: this will work at two in the morning but not before. Was he always right? No! Was he right often enough that Webb stopped questioning it after the first year? Yes. The record shop on South Michigan Avenue where Raymond had worked briefly in the early 1970s was called (at various points in its short history) Deep South Records, South Side Sound, and, in its final incarnation before it closed in 1974, simply The Shop. It specialized in soul & funk & the kind of import disco that arrived in unmarked sleeves from pressing plants in (DE) and (NL) and occasionally (IT), and it attracted a clientele that Raymond described, in one of the field notes recovered from the manila envelope, as people who were serious about music in the way that other people are serious about religion, meaning that the seriousness was not theoretical but practical and daily and connected to something they could not fully explain but were unwilling to give up. Raymond was not the owner of The Shop. He was a buyer & a floor person, which meant that he was responsible for finding the records and for talking to the customers about them and for knowing, on any given afternoon, which of the several hundred people who passed through in a week would want to know about a particular arrival and which would not. This was also a form of the knowledge described above. It was social rather than acoustic, but it operated by the same logic: specific, accumulated, resistant to systematization. When The Shop closed in 1974 Raymond took with him a cardboard box containing 47 records that the owner, a man named Desmond Farr, gave him in lieu of three weeks of unpaid wages. These 47 records became the foundation of Crate (1). By April 1977, when the first Saturday session took place, the collection had grown to approximately 400 records. By 1980 it was over 1,400. By the final entry in the log in March 1983 it stood at 2,291. Of these 2,291 records, Raymond could give a provenance for every single one. Not just the label and the pressing plant and the approximate date, though he knew these things, but the specific circumstances of acquisition: where he had found it, who had sold it to him, what it had cost, and (in many cases) something about the person who had made it, even if that person was known only by a pseudonym or a studio name or, in 34 cases across the entire collection, not known at all. The 34 anonymous records occupied a special category in Raymond's understanding of the collection. They were not mysterious to him in a romantic sense. They were practical problems! He wanted to know who had made them because knowing who had made something was part of understanding what it was.

Medium





Curated by
R. Lyle & C. Webb




Medium

There is a particular kind of knowledge that belongs to people who have spent a significant portion of their lives in record shops. It is not encyclopedic in the way that academic knowledge is encyclopedic. It does not proceed from general principles to specific cases. It proceeds in the opposite direction, from the specific object in the hand, the particular pressing, the weight of the vinyl, the color of the label, the condition of the sleeve, outward toward a general understanding that is never fully articulable because it is built from ten thousand individual encounters with ten thousand individual records rather than from any organizing theory. Raymond Lyle had this knowledge to a degree that Curtis Webb, who was not a record person in the same way, found genuinely difficult to comprehend. Webb understood sound systems. He understood acoustics & signal flow & the physics of low-frequency reproduction in enclosed spaces. What he did not understand, and said so freely when asked, was how Raymond could pick up a record he had never seen before, look at it for thirty seconds, and say with confidence: this will work at two in the morning but not before. Was he always right? No! Was he right often enough that Webb stopped questioning it after the first year? Yes. The record shop on South Michigan Avenue where Raymond had worked briefly in the early 1970s was called (at various points in its short history) Deep South Records, South Side Sound, and, in its final incarnation before it closed in 1974, simply The Shop. It specialized in soul & funk & the kind of import disco that arrived in unmarked sleeves from pressing plants in (DE) and (NL) and occasionally (IT), and it attracted a clientele that Raymond described, in one of the field notes recovered from the manila envelope, as people who were serious about music in the way that other people are serious about religion, meaning that the seriousness was not theoretical but practical and daily and connected to something they could not fully explain but were unwilling to give up. Raymond was not the owner of The Shop. He was a buyer & a floor person, which meant that he was responsible for finding the records and for talking to the customers about them and for knowing, on any given afternoon, which of the several hundred people who passed through in a week would want to know about a particular arrival and which would not. This was also a form of the knowledge described above. It was social rather than acoustic, but it operated by the same logic: specific, accumulated, resistant to systematization. When The Shop closed in 1974 Raymond took with him a cardboard box containing 47 records that the owner, a man named Desmond Farr, gave him in lieu of three weeks of unpaid wages. These 47 records became the foundation of Crate (1). By April 1977, when the first Saturday session took place, the collection had grown to approximately 400 records. By 1980 it was over 1,400. By the final entry in the log in March 1983 it stood at 2,291. Of these 2,291 records, Raymond could give a provenance for every single one. Not just the label and the pressing plant and the approximate date, though he knew these things, but the specific circumstances of acquisition: where he had found it, who had sold it to him, what it had cost, and (in many cases) something about the person who had made it, even if that person was known only by a pseudonym or a studio name or, in 34 cases across the entire collection, not known at all. The 34 anonymous records occupied a special category in Raymond's understanding of the collection.

Medium

They were not mysterious to him in a romantic sense. They were practical problems! He wanted to know who had made them because knowing who had made something was part of understanding what it was. A record pressed in (IL) in 1978 by someone who had grown up on the South Side and had access to a particular studio on West Lake Street was a different object from a record pressed in (DE) in the same year by someone working in a completely different tradition, even if the two records sounded superficially similar. Context was not decoration. It was information. Raymond applied this principle consistently across the entire collection and it shaped not only how he organized the crates but how he used the records in the room on Saturday nights. He never played a record he did not understand. He played records he did not fully understand only in the early hours of a night, before the room had committed itself to a particular direction, because the early hours had more tolerance for uncertainty. After midnight the room required precision! Not in the sense of technical correctness but in the sense of rightness, of the music fitting the specific state of the specific room at the specific moment, and that kind of rightness could only be achieved through knowledge rather than intuition, or rather through an intuition that had been built from knowledge accumulated over years of paying close attention. Was this approach teachable? Raymond said no, once, to a question posed by one of the DJs he had invited to share the booth in the later years of the Saturday sessions. The DJ, whose name appears in the log as T.G. (South Side), had asked whether there was a method, a way of learning how to read a room the way Raymond read it. Raymond said: the method is the room. You have to be in enough rooms for long enough that the rooms teach you. There is no shortcut & there is no theory that replaces the rooms. T.G. said he understood. Raymond said: you will understand better in five years. This exchange was recorded on one of the reel-to-reel tapes (Ref. No. CSA-TAPE-031, Saturday 7 March 1981, approximately 02:30). It is audible but partially obscured by the music playing at the time, which the log identifies as a record from Crate (9), title and artist not specified, filed under the notation: plays long, trust it. The collection was packed into the crates in which it had always been stored on the day the room on West Madison Street closed. The crates were moved to a storage unit in Pilsen (IL) and remained there until Raymond's death in 1989 (March 14th, aged 44). What happened to the collection between 1989 and 2009, when the milk crates and the other materials were found behind the false wall on South Halsted Street, is not fully documented. A partial account, pieced together from conversations with people who knew Raymond in the final years of his life, suggests that the collection was moved at least twice, that some records were sold or given away (estimates range from 80 to 200 individual records, none of which have been definitively identified), and that the remainder were stored in various locations around the South Side before ending up behind the false wall. Who built the false wall? When? For what purpose? These questions have not been answered to anyone's satisfaction! The private collector who acquired the materials in 2011 has declined to speculate. Curtis Webb, who has more knowledge of the period than anyone else still living, has said only that Raymond was careful about the things he cared about, and that the collection was one of the things he cared about most, and that the fact of its survival in whatever condition is not surprising to him. What Webb has not said, and what the record does not show, is what Raymond would have thought about the collection being found and catalogued and discussed by people who were not there on Saturday nights and did not know the room on West Madison Street from the inside. Webb was asked this question directly in 2014 (Chicago Sound Archive, Ref. No. CSA-2014-007). He was quiet for a long time before he answered. Then he said: Raymond would have wanted the records to be played. Not preserved! Played. There is a difference & he understood it better than anyone I have known.

Medium

The 34 records in Raymond Lyle's collection that carried no label and no identifying information represented, in his own words (field notes, undated, recovered from the manila envelope on South Halsted Street in 2009), the most interesting problem in the crates. Not the best records! He was careful to make this distinction. Some of the anonymous pressings were among the best records he owned. Others were mediocre. Several were pressing errors, records that had been cut incorrectly or at the wrong speed and pressed anyway, possibly because the pressing plant did not catch the error or possibly because whoever was paying for the run did not have the money or the time to do it again. But the interest of the anonymous records was not about quality. It was about the question of origin, which Raymond considered inseparable from the question of meaning. A record is made by someone in a specific place at a specific time with a specific set of tools & intentions & influences, and knowing those things is not a supplement to understanding the record but a component of it. Knowing that a record was made in a basement studio in Bronzeville (IL) in 1978 by two people who had grown up listening to gospel & soul & the import funk that came through The Shop on South Michigan Avenue tells you something about the record that is not audible in the record itself but that shapes how the record sounds once you know it. Raymond believed this completely & consistently across his entire career as a collector & selector, and the anonymous records troubled him not because they were unidentifiable in a practical sense (he could play them, he could use them in the room, he could appreciate their qualities without knowing who made them) but because they were incomplete in a way that he felt as a genuine deprivation. He investigated all 34 of them to the extent that investigation was possible given the resources available to him in Chicago (IL) in the late 1970s and early 1980s, which were not extensive! He talked to distributors & pressing plant operators & the owners of record shops in Chicago, Detroit (MI), and, on two occasions, New York (NY). He wrote letters (some of which appear to be among the papers in the manila envelope, though the correspondence is not fully decoded) to contacts in (GB) and (DE) who dealt in similar music. He held the records up to light sources of different intensities to try to read matrix numbers etched into the run-out groove, which was how pressing plant origins could sometimes be identified by people who knew the relevant codes. In six cases he was able to establish the pressing plant from the matrix number. In three more cases he was able to narrow the origin to one of two possible plants. In the remaining 25 cases the matrix numbers were either absent or illegible or led to plants that could not be further identified. Of the six records whose pressing plant was established, four were from (IL), one was from (MI), and one was from an operation in New Jersey (NJ) that had been pressing small-run independent music since the mid-1960s and that Raymond already knew through its labeled releases on three different small imprints. The New Jersey pressing was the most surprising because the music on it was clearly of Chicago origin in terms of its influences & production approach, and the question of why someone from Chicago would have pressed their music in New Jersey when there were perfectly adequate pressing facilities in (IL) was never resolved. Raymond's note in the log reads: NJ pressing, IL sound, unknown reason. Interesting. Filed Crate (7).

Medium

The 25 remaining anonymous records stayed in the crates in their original positions, filed according to Raymond's functional system rather than any identificatory one. Three of them were in Crate (15), the closing crate, which meant that Raymond considered them among the 23 most important records for ending a Saturday night. He played them regularly. He played them carefully! He cleaned them before every play with a carbon fiber brush & an anti-static cloth that he kept in a small case on the shelf above the turntables, because he understood that records without a pressing history could not be replaced and that the groove wore a little each time the stylus passed through it and that the number of times the stylus could pass through it was therefore finite & not to be wasted. The care he took with the anonymous pressings was greater than the care he took with labeled records, not because the anonymous ones were more valuable in any commercial sense (they had no commercial value at all) but because they were more irreplaceable. A record that was pressed in a run of 5,000 copies and distributed nationally is replaceable. A record pressed in a run of 200 copies and distributed to nobody, kept in a crate on the West Side of Chicago (IL) by one person who understood its value, is not replaceable in any meaningful sense! It is unique even if it was not intended to be unique. Raymond understood this & acted accordingly. The anonymous pressings from Crate (15) were among the materials recovered from South Halsted Street in 2009. They are in the private collection in Evanston (IL). The collector has had them cleaned professionally & has played each one on a high-quality turntable to verify their condition. Two have surface damage that affects playback quality but does not render them unlistenable. The other 22 are in good condition. All 25 anonymous pressings from the collection are accounted for in the recovery. None of the labeled records from Crate (15) survived. Whether they were sold, given away, lost, or destroyed in the period between Raymond's death in 1989 and the recovery in 2009 is not known. The collector considers this the most significant gap in the collection & has said so in correspondence that has not been made public. Webb, when told about the gap, said only: Raymond would have known which ones were missing & why. He kept that kind of knowledge in his head. It did not need to be written down because he was always there to carry it. When he was no longer there, the knowledge went with him. That is what knowledge does when it is not written down! It follows the person. The records stay but the understanding of the records leaves. What you are left with is objects without their full context, and objects without their full context are still objects & still have value, but they are not the same as they were when the person who understood them was in the room. This is not a tragedy. It is just how things are. Raymond knew how things are. He built something anyway. That seems to me the correct response to how things are.

Heavy

Closing
Time

Heavy

Plain Black VINYL ONLY
January 1979
Reel-2-Reel

Heavy Italic

IPS
BASS!
Hz

Heavy

Watts
Ampex
①④

Heavy Italic

The 34 records in Raymond Lyle's collection that carried no label and no identifying information represented, in his own words (field notes, undated, recovered from the manila envelope on South Halsted Street in 2009), the most interesting problem in the crates. Not the best records! He was careful to make this distinction. Some of the anonymous pressings were among the best records he owned. Others were mediocre. Several were pressing errors, records that had been cut incorrectly or at the wrong speed and pressed anyway, possibly because the pressing plant did not catch the error or possibly because whoever was paying for the run did not have the money or the time to do it again. But the interest of the anonymous records was not about quality. It was about the question of origin, which Raymond considered inseparable from the question of meaning. A record is made by someone in a specific place at a specific time with a specific set of tools & intentions & influences, and knowing those things is not a supplement to understanding the record but a component of it. Knowing that a record was made in a basement studio in Bronzeville (IL) in 1978 by two people who had grown up listening to gospel & soul & the import funk that came through The Shop on South Michigan Avenue tells you something about the record that is not audible in the record itself but that shapes how the record sounds once you know it. Raymond believed this completely & consistently across his entire career as a collector & selector, and the anonymous records troubled him not because they were unidentifiable in a practical sense (he could play them, he could use them in the room, he could appreciate their qualities without knowing who made them) but because they were incomplete in a way that he felt as a genuine deprivation. He investigated all 34 of them to the extent that investigation was possible given the resources available to him in Chicago (IL) in the late 1970s and early 1980s, which were not extensive! He talked to distributors & pressing plant operators & the owners of record shops in Chicago, Detroit (MI), and, on two occasions, New York (NY). He wrote letters (some of which appear to be among the papers in the manila envelope, though the correspondence is not fully decoded) to contacts in (GB) and (DE) who dealt in similar music. He held the records up to light sources of different intensities to try to read matrix numbers etched into the run-out groove, which was how pressing plant origins could sometimes be identified by people who knew the relevant codes. In six cases he was able to establish the pressing plant from the matrix number. In three more cases he was able to narrow the origin to one of two possible plants. In the remaining 25 cases the matrix numbers were either absent or illegible or led to plants that could not be further identified. Of the six records whose pressing plant was established, four were from (IL), one was from (MI), and one was from an operation in New Jersey (NJ) that had been pressing small-run independent music since the mid-1960s and that Raymond already knew through its labeled releases on three different small imprints. The New Jersey pressing was the most surprising because the music on it was clearly of Chicago origin in terms of its influences & production approach, and the question of why someone from Chicago would have pressed their music in New Jersey when there were perfectly adequate pressing facilities in (IL) was never resolved. Raymond's note in the log reads: NJ pressing, IL sound, unknown reason. Interesting. Filed Crate (7). The 25 remaining anonymous records stayed in the crates in their original positions, filed according to Raymond's functional system rather than any identificatory one. Three of them were in Crate (15), the closing crate, which meant that Raymond considered them among the 23 most important records for ending a Saturday night. He played them regularly. He played them carefully! He cleaned them before every play with a carbon fiber brush & an anti-static cloth that he kept in a small case on the shelf above the turntables, because he understood that records without a pressing history could not be replaced and that the groove wore a little each time the stylus passed through it and that the number of times the stylus could pass through it was therefore finite & not to be wasted. The care he took with the anonymous pressings was greater than the care he took with labeled records, not because the anonymous ones were more valuable in any commercial sense (they had no commercial value at all) but because they were more irreplaceable. A record that was pressed in a run of 5,000 copies and distributed nationally is replaceable. A record pressed in a run of 200 copies and distributed to nobody, kept in a crate on the West Side of Chicago (IL) by one person who understood its value, is not replaceable in any meaningful sense! It is unique even if it was not intended to be unique. Raymond understood this & acted accordingly. The anonymous pressings from Crate (15) were among the materials recovered from South Halsted Street in 2009. They are in the private collection in Evanston (IL). The collector has had them cleaned professionally & has played each one on a high-quality turntable to verify their condition. Two have surface damage that affects playback quality but does not render them unlistenable. The other 22 are in good condition. All 25 anonymous pressings from the collection are accounted for in the recovery. None of the labeled records from Crate (15) survived. Whether they were sold, given away, lost, or destroyed in the period between Raymond's death in 1989 and the recovery in 2009 is not known. The collector considers this the most significant gap in the collection & has said so in correspondence that has not been made public. Webb, when told about the gap, said only: Raymond would have known which ones were missing & why. He kept that kind of knowledge in his head. It did not need to be written down because he was always there to carry it. When he was no longer there, the knowledge went with him. That is what knowledge does when it is not written down! It follows the person. The records stay but the understanding of the records leaves. What you are left with is objects without their full context, and objects without their full context are still objects & still have value, but they are not the same as they were when the person who understood them was in the room. This is not a tragedy. It is just how things are. Raymond knew how things are. He built something anyway. That seems to me the correct response to how things are.

Heavy

Matrix etched manually
into run-out groove ©1979.

Heavy

The green ledger purchased on West Lake Street contained ❾ ruled sections, each assigned by Raymond to a specific category of record. Section ❶ covered acquisitions made through the distributor on West Randolph Street. Section ❷ covered direct acquisitions from artists and producers who brought records to the building in person. Section ❸ covered records sourced from other shops in Chicago and, on ❽ documented occasions, from shops in Detroit and New York. Section ❹ covered import pressings from ❻ countries: GB, DE, NL, IT, FR, and JP. Section ❺ covered records with no identifiable origin, the anonymous pressings that Raymond considered the most interesting problem in the collection. Section ❻ covered test pressings and acetates, of which there were ❷ acetates and ❻ test pressings by the time the log was complete.

Heavy

22:00 Open Door Policy
22:07 Late Arrival
22:42 First Body
22:51 Warm Room
23:03 Low Ceiling
23:17 Concrete Floor
23:55 Slow Build
00:03 No Windows
00:14 Interior Light
00:38 Second Movement
00:58 Repeat Sequence
01:11 Deep Frequency
01:39 Parallel Room
01:55 Four to the Floor
02:14 Continuous Feed
02:22 Body Heat
02:58 Minimum Pressure
03:08 Return Signal
03:21 Extended Version
03:39 Raw Material
03:51 Low End Theory
04:01 Closed Circuit
04:09 Inner Room
04:26 Late Sequence
04:44 No Resolution
04:53 Gradual Return
05:11 Morning Frequency
05:28 First Light
05:29 Open Window
05:33 Slow Exit
05:44 Last Body
05:51 Departure Signal

Heavy

① Basement
② South Loop
③ Pilsen
④ Englewood
⑤ Pullman
⑥ Calumet
⑦ Chatham

① Woodlawn
② Bridgeport
③ Wicker Park
④ Bronzeville
⑤ Hyde Park

① Humboldt
② Bucktown
③ Chatham
④ River North
⑤ Blue Island

Available Styles

Nuckle

  • Nuckle Hairline
  • Nuckle Hairline Italic
  • Nuckle Thin
  • Nuckle Thin Italic
  • Nuckle Light
  • Nuckle Light Italic
  • Nuckle Regular
  • Nuckle Italic
  • Nuckle Medium
  • Nuckle Medium Italic
  • Nuckle SemiBold
  • Nuckle SemiBold Italic
  • Nuckle Bold
  • Nuckle Bold Italic
  • Nuckle Heavy
  • Nuckle Heavy Italic

Version 2.031, build 3342.0

About

Nuckle is one of the first Heavyweight fonts, in fact, the oldest one. The first designs of this alphabet appeared back in 2011, before the Heavyweight was officially formed. Nuckle developed naturally, as a functional grotesque which met the demands of specific graphic applications, typical for Heavyweight’s style. The initial form was therefore not based on a pronounced style; nevertheless, particularly in application in text, its potential was clear. It grew in strength, not in terms of particular letters, but primarily in reading text blocks. At that time, it was clear that the initial phases of the creation of the basic skeleton of a typeface have been completed and an extensive study of grotesques was launched nearly immediately. Deeper research and seek for the ideal position in this font category led to Nuckle’s clear ambition to be different than the mass of modern sans-serif alphabets that refer to the same principles. An uneasy task was determining the main property that would be specific for the font’s character and function. Constant testing in practice resulted in the identification of several demands that would fit the idea of an ideal tool in contemporary graphic design. During the subsequent designing of letter shapes that contribute to the character of the extensive font family, the need to increase the x-Height of the type was identified, at the same time increasing the type’s universality. Thanks to that, Nuckle works even better even in the slightest settings, but also in poster size, where it perfectly fills the space between lines. After all, the more compressed line leading appears to be a pleasant advantage in longer text settings, as is documented by the specific application of the typeface in a catalogue for the FAMU Film Festival, where Nuckle appears in sizes 4b to 12b. The difference in size between lowercase and uppercase letters is minimal, which logically puts great stress on the legibility of accents. The Nuckle font is used by Heavyweight in its logotype. Other uses include the identity of the Paris fashion brand Courreges, Gerhard Richter exhibition at the Prague National Gallery, and the Marseille Riam Festival.

Supported Languages

Acheron, Achinese, Acholi, Achuar-Shiwiar, Afar, Afrikaans, Aguaruna, Alekano, Aleut, Amahuaca, Amarakaeri, Amis, Anaang, Andaandi, Anuta, Arabela, Aragonese, Arbëreshë Albanian, Asháninka, Ashéninka Perené, Asturian, Atayal, Awa-Cuaiquer, Balinese, Balkan Romani, Banjar, Bari, Basque, Batak Dairi, Batak Karo, Batak Mandailing, Batak Simalungun, Batak Toba, Bemba (Zambia), Bena (Tanzania), Biali, Bikol, Bini, Bislama, Bora, Borana-Arsi-Guji Oromo, Bosnian, Breton, Buginese, Candoshi-Shapra, Caquinte, Caribbean Hindustani, Cashibo-Cacataibo, Cashinahua, Catalan, Cebuano, Central Aymara, Central Kurdish, Central Nahuatl, Chachi, Chamorro, Chavacano, Chayahuita, Chiga, Chiltepec Chinantec, Chokwe, Chuukese, Cimbrian, Cofán, Cornish, Corsican, Creek, Crimean Tatar, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dehu, Dutch, Eastern Arrernte, Eastern Oromo, Efik, English, Faroese, Fijian, Filipino, Finnish, French, Friulian, Gagauz, Galician, Ganda, Garifuna, German, Gheg Albanian, Gilbertese, Gooniyandi, Gourmanchéma, Guadeloupean Creole French, Gusii, Gwichʼin, Haitian, Hani, Hiligaynon, Hopi, Huastec, Hungarian, Icelandic, Igbo, Iloko, Inari Sami, Indonesian, Irish, Istro Romanian, Italian, Ixcatlán Mazatec, Jamaican Creole English, Javanese, Jola-Fonyi, K'iche', Kabuverdianu, Kaingang, Kala Lagaw Ya, Kalaallisut, Kalenjin, Kamba (Kenya), Kaonde, Karelian, Kashubian, Kekchí, Mattokki, Khasi, Kikuyu, Kimbundu, Kinyarwanda, Kom (Cameroon), Kongo, Konzo, Koyraboro Senni Songhai, Kven Finnish, Kölsch, Ladin, Ladino, Langi, Latgalian, Lithuanian, Lombard, Low German, Lower Sorbian, Luba-Lulua, Lule Sami, Luo (Kenya and Tanzania), Luxembourgish, Macedo-Romanian, Madurese, Makonde, Malagasy, Maltese, Mandinka, Mandjak, Mankanya, Manx, Maore Comorian, Maori, Mapudungun, Marshallese, Matsés, Meriam Mir, Meru, Metlatónoc Mixtec, Mezquital Otomi, Mi'kmaq, Minangkabau, Mirandese, Mohawk, Montenegrin, Munsee, Murrinh-Patha, Murui Huitoto, Mwani, Mískito, Naga Pidgin, Ndonga, Neapolitan, Ngazidja Comorian, Niuean, Nobiin, Nomatsiguenga, North Ndebele, Northern Kurdish, Northern Qiandong Miao, Northern Sami, Northern Uzbek, Norwegian, Nyanja, Nyankole, Ojitlán Chinantec, Orma, Oroqen, Palauan, Pampanga, Papantla Totonac, Papiamento, Pedi, Picard, Pichis Ashéninka, Piemontese, Pijin, Pintupi-Luritja, Pipil, Pohnpeian, Polish, Portuguese, Potawatomi, Purepecha, Páez, Quechua, Romanian, Romansh, Rotokas, Rundi, Samoan, Sango, Sangu (Tanzania), Saramaccan, Sardinian, Scots, Scottish Gaelic, Secoya, Sena, Seri, Seselwa Creole French, Sharanahua, Shawnee, Shipibo-Conibo, Shona, Shuar, Sicilian, Silesian, Siona, Slovak, Slovenian, Soga, Somali, Soninke, South Ndebele, Southern Aymara, Southern Qiandong Miao, Southern Sami, Southern Sotho, Spanish, Sranan Tongo, Standard Estonian, Standard Latvian, Standard Malay, Sundanese, Swedish, Swiss German, Tagalog, Tahitian, Tedim Chin, Tetum, Tetun Dili, Toba, Tok Pisin, Tokelau, Tonga (Tonga Islands), Tonga (Zambia), Tosk Albanian, Tumbuka, Turkish, Turkmen, Tuvalu, Tzeltal, Tzotzil, Uab Meto, Umbundu, Ume Sami, Upper Guinea Crioulo, Upper Sorbian, Urarina, Venetian, Veps, Vlax Romani, Võro, Walloon, Walser, Waray (Philippines), Warlpiri, Wayuu, Welsh, West Central Oromo, West-Central Limba, Western Abnaki, Western Frisian, Wiradjuri, Wolof, Xhosa, Yagua, Yanesha', Yao, Yoruba, Yucateco, Zapotec, Zarma, Zulu, Záparo

OpenType Features

Localized Forms
Glyph Composition/Decomposition
Standard Ligatures
Discretionary Ligatures
Contextual Alternates
Case-Sensitive Forms
Proportional Figures
Tabular Figures
Fractions
Numerators
Denominators
Ordinals
Superscript
Subscript
Scientific Inferiors
Slashed Zero
Stylistic Set 1 (alternate a)
Stylistic Set 2 (alternate Figures)
Stylistic Set 3 (arrows)
Stylistic Set 4 (white circled letters)
Stylistic Set 5 (black circled letters)
Stylistic Set 6 (alternate slashed zero)
Stylistic Set 7 (tabular signs)
Stylistic Set 8 (alternate multiplication sign)

Character Set

ASCII
ISO-8859-1 / Latin 1
Windows 1250C (Central European)
Windows 1254 (Turkish)
Windows 1257 (Baltic)
Adobe Latin 1
Adobe Latin 2